| |
|
|
Conference I : Developing Durable Peace Processes & Partners |
|
|
 |
|
The first conference looked at lessons learned from
peace processes underway in Northern Ireland, Israel-Palestine and
India-Pakistan. The conference report,
What Makes a Peace Process Irreversible?
is available from the Delhi Policy Group.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Conference II : Finding Common Ground: India’s Global Peacemaking Interests |
|
|
|
The second conference looked at recent or in-process
peace agreements, and the challenges of post-conflict
stabilization, with special reference to Sudan, Afghanistan
and Sri Lanka. The conference report titled
Peace Agreements
and After is available from the Delhi Policy Group.
|
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
|
Conference III : Global Agendas: Peacemaking in the 21st Century |
|
|
 |
|
The third conference reviewed big picture issues in relation to the growing
opportunities for European-Indian strategic partnerships, especially over the UN
Peace-Building Commission. It asked whether there was a new dynamism in Asian
engagement, and how this could influence European-Indian cooperation.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Conference IV : Peace Processes Compared: Europe & South Asia |
|
|
|
The fourth conference was held by our partner Dublin City University, and
combined presentations on India-Pakistan, Afghanistan and the Irish peace
process with briefings by cross-border institutions in Ireland, and the UK
government’s Northern Ireland Office in Belfast.
|
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
|
Conference V : South Asian Peace Processes: Kashmir & Afghanistan |
|
|
 |
|
The fifth conference, combined different
sessions, a one-day conference at the European Parliament
in Brussels on South Asian peace processes, a round table
at the Catholic University Louvain, and a round table at
the think tank IFRI in Paris, on India, Pakistan and Kashmir.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Conference VI : Pluralism and Democracy After 9/11: Europe & India |
|
|
|
The sixth and final conference took the broad
parameter of the India and European shared values as a
basis for cooperation on peace and security at the
global and regional levels, and compared their different
models of pluralism and democracy, looking both at how
successfully they have adapted to our ongoing peace
processes and at how they affect our ability to deal
with the fallout from the war on terrorism at home
and abroad.
|
|
|
|
