|
 |
Home >
Peace Processes >
Conferences >
Conference VI

|
Conference VI:
Pluralism and Democracy After 9/11: Europe & India
|
|
This was the sixth and the
final conference of the program. It sought to pull together some of threads
from the five preceding conferences by addressing the following questions:
|
|
| |
• |
|
Can shared values lead India and Europe to cooperate more
closely on strategies for peace
and security at the institutional and/or regional levels?
|
|
| |
• |
|
What might closer collaboration entail, and what would be the issues
of potential collaboration? Apart from cooperating at the UN, what
other institutional ties
for collaborative peacemaking and Peace-Building can India and Europe build?
|
|
| |
• |
|
Do Indian and European models of pluralism and democracy—including
on migration—affect our policies/ability to deal with the fallout
from the war on terrorism, at home and abroad? How well or badly
does each model work,
and how do the differences affect our abilities to cooperate?
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Opening Session
|
|
|
In an attempt to understand how India and Europe could cooperate
the conference looked at how to:
|
|
| |
• |
|
further the ongoing peace processes in and/or between many of
the South Asian countries—Afghanistan-Pakistan; India-Pakistan;
agreements between the military, and religious
parties and/or groups in Pakistan; and one underway in Nepal;
|
|
| |
• |
|
address the conflicts in West Asia—Iraq, Israel-Palestine,
the attack on Lebanon, and the looming conflict with Iran; and
|
|
| |
• |
|
control the growing non-state radicalism in South-East
Asia which are threatening the stabilization processes in Asia.
|
|
|
|
The conference ended on the following note:
|
|
| |
|
|
Since most modern day conflicts in the world are linked to
issues of diversity and governance, both India and Europe
have much to learn from each other’s successful experiences
at reconciling pluralism with democracy (for example, India’s
management of its
internal diversity or the formation of the European Union).
|
|
| |
|
|
The European Union model, in which a number of countries
with separate and conflicting national agendas come together,
can be instructive for India in
how it deals with its own troubled neighborhood.
|
|
| |
|
|
In turn, the manner in which the Indian constitutional model has
managed to accommodate the immense amount of religious, caste
and regional differences within the country should serve as a
useful template for the Europe to deal with its growing internal
communal differences, differences which if not dealt with properly
will lead to
situations like the Parisian or post-Danish cartoon riots.
|
|
| |
|
|
Importantly, both Europe and India view pluralism and democracy as
a positive and in the post-9/11 world can, and should, work closely to
further these values in regions torn asunder by conflicts arising
out of religious or communal differences. Their experiences
show that taking into account different national and communal
sensibilities while working for peace is the best strategy in
such situations. Institutionalization of such a cooperation
should be explored at
both state and non-state levels.
|
|
|
|
|
|  |
|